District report card · CMAS 2024–2026

Summit RE-1Draft

Mid-size rural district · about 1,399 students tested a year in grades 3–8 · 3,321 students in district-run schools (K–12)
−4.2
points vs. what its
demographics predict

Based on its families’ demographics, Summit RE-1 would be expected to rank #29 of 105 Colorado districts, with 45% of students meeting or exceeding expectations in English and 38% in math. It actually ranks #39, with 42% and 33%. That is 4.2 percentage points below what its demographics predict, which ranks it #70 of 105 on performance vs. demographics.

#70 of 105 statewide · likely #53–#80#29 of 49 mid-size districts#28 of 46 rural districts#5 of 9 among its most similar districts

Where demographics would place it, and where it lands

Statewide rank, English and math combined
Hollow: predicted from demographics. Filled: actual results. #1 is the highest share of students meeting expectations.
#1 (best)#25#50#75#105Predicted #29Actual #39
SubjectExpectedActualOver/under (pts)Rank: predicted → actualRank vs. demographics
English45%42%−3.3 ±1.8#30 → #42#64
Math38%33%−5.1 ±3.6#24 → #37#73

Met or exceeded expectations on CMAS, grades 3–8, 2024–2026 combined. District results include district-run neighborhood, choice and magnet schools, but not charter or online schools. ± is a 90% range for normal year-to-year swings.

Over time

Met or exceeded expectations, by year
Dashed: expected from demographics.
20%30%40%50%60%202420252026English 43%Math 34%
Growth
CDE median growth percentile, 2024–2026: how much students improved compared with students statewide who started at the same level. 50 is typical.
English growth
51
median growth percentile
Math growth
53
median growth percentile

Growth depends much less on family background than test scores do, so it is the closer measure of what schools add in a given year.

Compared with its most similar districts

Over/under, percentage points (English and math)
The eight districts closest on parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education and size. Blue: above prediction; red: below; gray: within normal swings. Lines: 90% range.
St Vrain Valley RE1J+2.2Garfield Re-2−0.2Adams 12 Five Star Schools−2.1School District 27J−3.8Summit RE-1−4.2Eagle County RE 50−5.7Bennett 29J−10.0Roaring Fork RE-1−10.1Estes Park R-3−10.2

Who it serves

The measures behind the prediction
Bars: this district. Black tick: Colorado average across ranked districts, weighted by students.
Parents with a bachelor’s degree+50%Free/reduced-price lunch38%English learners31%Students with IEPs13%

Parents’ education: parents of public-school children (Census ACS 2019–2023, NCES tabulation). For context, not in the prediction: all adults with a bachelor’s degree+ 53%; median household income $106,442.

Its schools

Neighborhood schools
Compared with Colorado schools serving similar students (income and education of the area, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education). Points are CMAS scale-score points vs. expected, 2024–2026.
SchoolMet/exceeded
Eng / Math
Vs. expected
English
Vs. expected
Math
Growth
Upper Blue Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–558% / 50%+13.5+14.155
Dillon Valley Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–536% / 32%−3.5−2.453
Summit Cove Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–542% / 45%−7.1−3.254
Breckenridge Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–560% / 50%−2.9−7.544
Frisco Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–550% / 43%−7.8−10.367
Silverthorne Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–526% / 18%−5.5−13.652
Summit Middle SchoolMiddle · grades 6–844% / 33%−3.2−4.051

How to read this

The expected result comes from a statistical model fit across all ranked Colorado districts: parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners and special education explain about 90% of the differences in district results. Over/under is what remains — the part the demographics don’t account for, which includes the schools themselves but also anything else those measures miss. Each district’s expected value is predicted from the other districts. Full method and caveats.