District report card · CMAS 2024–2026

Fountain 8Draft

Mid-size suburban district · about 3,212 students tested a year in grades 3–8 · 7,358 students in district-run schools (K–12)
−4.1
points vs. what its
demographics predict

Based on its families’ demographics, Fountain 8 would be expected to rank #55 of 105 Colorado districts, with 39% of students meeting or exceeding expectations in English and 29% in math. It actually ranks #63, with 35% and 25%. That is 4.1 percentage points below what its demographics predict, which ranks it #68 of 105 on performance vs. demographics.

#68 of 105 statewide · likely #61–#74#27 of 49 mid-size districts#12 of 17 suburban districts#6 of 9 among its most similar districts

Where demographics would place it, and where it lands

Statewide rank, English and math combined
Hollow: predicted from demographics. Filled: actual results. #1 is the highest share of students meeting expectations.
#1 (best)#25#50#75#105Predicted #55Actual #63
SubjectExpectedActualOver/under (pts)Rank: predicted → actualRank vs. demographics
English39%35%−4.4 ±0.8#52 → #58#72
Math29%25%−3.8 ±1.8#57 → #62#64

Met or exceeded expectations on CMAS, grades 3–8, 2024–2026 combined. District results include district-run neighborhood, choice and magnet schools, but not charter or online schools. ± is a 90% range for normal year-to-year swings.

Over time

Met or exceeded expectations, by year
Dashed: expected from demographics.
10%20%30%40%50%202420252026English 35%Math 27%
Growth
CDE median growth percentile, 2024–2026: how much students improved compared with students statewide who started at the same level. 50 is typical.
English growth
47
median growth percentile
Math growth
46
median growth percentile

Growth depends much less on family background than test scores do, so it is the closer measure of what schools add in a given year.

Compared with its most similar districts

Over/under, percentage points (English and math)
The eight districts closest on parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education and size. Blue: above prediction; red: below; gray: within normal swings. Lines: 90% range.
Delta County 50(J)+8.1Mesa County Valley 51+4.7Canon City RE-1+2.2Montrose County RE-1J+1.8Pueblo County 70−0.9Fountain 8−4.1Fremont RE-2−5.3Valley RE-1−5.6Montezuma-Cortez RE-1−7.5

Who it serves

The measures behind the prediction
Bars: this district. Black tick: Colorado average across ranked districts, weighted by students.
Parents with a bachelor’s degree+32%Free/reduced-price lunch50%English learners5%Students with IEPs19%

Parents’ education: parents of public-school children (Census ACS 2019–2023, NCES tabulation). For context, not in the prediction: all adults with a bachelor’s degree+ 32%; median household income $78,009.

Its schools

Neighborhood schools
Compared with Colorado schools serving similar students (income and education of the area, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education). Points are CMAS scale-score points vs. expected, 2024–2026.
SchoolMet/exceeded
Eng / Math
Vs. expected
English
Vs. expected
Math
Growth
Jordahl Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–546% / 50%+1.9+9.054
Eagleside Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–543% / 35%+1.7−0.746
Aragon Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–529% / 18%+0.7+0.252
Patriot Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–533% / 27%−2.1−2.449
Mesa Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–532% / 28%−7.5−4.551
Weikel Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–538% / 29%−7.6−9.045
Mountainside Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–527% / 22%−8.2−8.637
Abrams Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–524% / 18%−9.6−8.145
Fountain Middle SchoolMiddle · grades 6–838% / 20%+0.3−1.448
Carson Middle SchoolMiddle · grades 6–831% / 18%−6.3−6.843

How to read this

The expected result comes from a statistical model fit across all ranked Colorado districts: parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners and special education explain about 90% of the differences in district results. Over/under is what remains — the part the demographics don’t account for, which includes the schools themselves but also anything else those measures miss. Each district’s expected value is predicted from the other districts. Full method and caveats.