District report card · CMAS 2024–2026

Englewood 1Draft

Mid-size suburban district · about 832 students tested a year in grades 3–8 · 2,143 students in district-run schools (K–12)
−8.1
points vs. what its
demographics predict

Based on its families’ demographics, Englewood 1 would be expected to rank #46 of 105 Colorado districts, with 42% of students meeting or exceeding expectations in English and 32% in math. It actually ranks #65, with 33% and 24%. That is 8.1 percentage points below what its demographics predict, which ranks it #85 of 105 on performance vs. demographics.

#85 of 105 statewide · likely #77–#89#39 of 49 mid-size districts#16 of 17 suburban districts#8 of 9 among its most similar districts

Where demographics would place it, and where it lands

Statewide rank, English and math combined
Hollow: predicted from demographics. Filled: actual results. #1 is the highest share of students meeting expectations.
#1 (best)#25#50#75#105Predicted #46Actual #65
SubjectExpectedActualOver/under (pts)Rank: predicted → actualRank vs. demographics
English42%33%−8.9 ±1.5#43 → #66#85
Math32%24%−7.3 ±2.1#48 → #63#79

Met or exceeded expectations on CMAS, grades 3–8, 2024–2026 combined. District results include district-run neighborhood, choice and magnet schools, but not charter or online schools. ± is a 90% range for normal year-to-year swings.

Over time

Met or exceeded expectations, by year
Dashed: expected from demographics.
10%20%30%40%50%202420252026English 31%Math 27%
Growth
CDE median growth percentile, 2024–2026: how much students improved compared with students statewide who started at the same level. 50 is typical.
English growth
45
median growth percentile
Math growth
49
median growth percentile

Growth depends much less on family background than test scores do, so it is the closer measure of what schools add in a given year.

Compared with its most similar districts

Over/under, percentage points (English and math)
The eight districts closest on parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education and size. Blue: above prediction; red: below; gray: within normal swings. Lines: 90% range.
Delta County 50(J)+8.1Montrose County RE-1J+1.8Pueblo County 70−0.9Fountain 8−4.1Valley RE-1−5.6Holyoke Re-1J−6.5Montezuma-Cortez RE-1−7.5Englewood 1−8.1Ignacio 11 JT−15.6

Who it serves

The measures behind the prediction
Bars: this district. Black tick: Colorado average across ranked districts, weighted by students.
Parents with a bachelor’s degree+42%Free/reduced-price lunch65%English learners13%Students with IEPs18%

Parents’ education: parents of public-school children (Census ACS 2019–2023, NCES tabulation). For context, not in the prediction: all adults with a bachelor’s degree+ 46%; median household income $79,488.

Its schools

Neighborhood schools
Compared with Colorado schools serving similar students (income and education of the area, free/reduced lunch, English learners, special education). Points are CMAS scale-score points vs. expected, 2024–2026.
SchoolMet/exceeded
Eng / Math
Vs. expected
English
Vs. expected
Math
Growth
Clayton Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–533% / 28%−2.2+0.152
Charles Hay World SchoolElementary · grades 3–545% / 34%−0.8−7.457
Wm E Bishop Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–523% / 16%−8.7−4.757
Cherrelyn Elementary SchoolElementary · grades 3–526% / 23%−9.1−8.856
Wm E Bishop Elementary SchoolMiddle · grades 6–834% / 43%+10.8+21.8—
Englewood Leadership AcademyMiddle · grades 6–862% / 50%+8.4+3.349
Clayton Elementary SchoolMiddle · grades 6–838% / 20%+1.1+1.0—
Cherrelyn Elementary SchoolMiddle · grades 6–838% / —−1.5+1.9—
Charles Hay World SchoolMiddle · grades 6–845% / 29%−2.0−3.7—
Englewood Middle SchoolMiddle · grades 6–823% / 18%−10.5−2.432

How to read this

The expected result comes from a statistical model fit across all ranked Colorado districts: parents’ education, free/reduced lunch, English learners and special education explain about 90% of the differences in district results. Over/under is what remains — the part the demographics don’t account for, which includes the schools themselves but also anything else those measures miss. Each district’s expected value is predicted from the other districts. Full method and caveats.